Search for: "INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit decided the Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:20 pm
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 125 S. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.: Greater Research Protection for Drug Manufacturers, DJCLPP:See Lawrence Ebert, One Response to Merck v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:29 am
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:54 am
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193, 202 (2005). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193, 202 (2005) (citing Eli Lilly, 496 U.S. at 665-69). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005) (research exception to infringement) F.T.C. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd., 125 S. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:18 am
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005) the Court explained that Congress intended that the immunity of regulatory activity not be inhibited, stating that "'271(e)(1)'s exemption from infringement extends to all uses of patented inventions that are reasonably related to the development and submission of any information under the FDCA. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005): a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the use of a patented compound in experiments that are not themselves included in a submission of information to the FDA does not, standing alone, render the use infringing. [read post]